![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgTqquT7VhaNKrPbMu4Y635jnppNlBcw9alZcTElifz79BI2w_4RQ8KV5ze9FcLvljG_-JFqyN4HdMBHt15h2aN1kKMvFf3a_BBl-spbh2uRKtndW4rkqERKLNWcT3_bu4gRneT7AuYabU_/s200/iceberg.jpg)
It should be apparent from Monday's lecture that vapor pressure lowering for ideal solutions is an obvious consequence of Raoult's Law, although all solutions experience the phenomenon (which is due to the fact that the chemical potential is lower for a solution than it is for the solvent: μ1(soln)=μ*1(l)+RTlnX1). But all four of these phenomena are explained by setting the appropriate chemical potentials equal (where we designate 1 as the solvent and 2 as the solute):
vp lowering: μ1(soln) = μ1(g)
fp depression: μ1(soln) = μ1(s)
bp elevation: μ1(soln) = μ1(g)
osmotic pressure: μ1(l) = μ1(soln) + ΠVm
Using some math elegance with a few key assumptions (like ∆transH being relatively constant and the solution dilute), we are able to obtain the experimentally obtained formulae familiar to students of general chemistry:
bp elevation: ∆Tb=Kbm where [ebullioscopic constant] Kb=RM1Tb2/∆vapH
fp elevation: ∆Tf=Kfm where [cryoscopic constant] Kf=RM1Tf2/∆fusH
osmotic pressure: Π=MRT
Since we have thus far dealt only with molecular [nonionic] solutions, we needed to refresh some concepts from basic electrostatics [coulomb's law, electric permittivity, dielectric constants] before moving onto ionic solutions, which can be radically different (and never truly ideal).
No comments:
Post a Comment